AUR is centralized opposed to PPA's, meaning that there's one place to look rather than many so it's easier to find what you want, there are some arguments against centralization though. Arch Linux is ranked 5th while Linux Mint is ranked 13th. Although I do prefer apt-get/aptitude. Yet no split packages, and doesn't support any method besides pacstrap. Ubuntu, Fedora, Pop! A versioned release cycle, this places certain guarantees that all packages within one version work well together. The biggest difference you will see is its comprehensive installation process, which is completely different from other Linux… Don't listen to him, install antergos (arch). Bar the inevitable eventual explosion, I'd argue that running this install of Arch is EASIER than the corresponding 3 major updates of Ubuntu I would have endured in the same period. Ubuntu's policy is to patch upstream software to improve it. Email. I think ArchLinux is far less less security focused than other distributions and would be an inappropriate choice if you want SELinux, although that is apparently a work in progress. Manjaro made its debut in 2011. It's like the actual repository that pacman uses, but anyone can upload to it, so you end up with a ton of very useful packages that you would have to build if it didn't exist -- always a plus for me. And one should carefully read forums before doing it. This means that names are not given out on a "first come first served" basis. Couple of reasons why one might choose Arch over Ubuntu: KISS principle. Debian and Arch have Steam packaged, where Fedora does not. ... Arch uses a rolling release model for updates. I think no, because every distro is good for learn programming especially C. But, if you're curious about Arch and you can install it. I will bite. The Ubuntu Software Center offers a GUI interface for installing new apps which is extremely easy and welcoming for beginners to Linux. if you want software that was updated yesterday, and are super bleeding edge, than Ubuntu isn't for you. The downside is that you have to know what you need. Programming is not going to change whatever the distro you choose but if you're a noob most tutorials are going to be for Ubuntu. This guarantees that the system at least boots and more or less works before you start cutting into the fat. I have been using Ubuntu quite happily, but I was thinking of using ArchLinux because so many people are talking about it.The main use of a Linux system is to learn C programming and basic to intermediate Linux commands.Will learning ArchLinux benefit me more than Ubuntu in any way, shape or form? The downside is that you have to know what you need. OS and other mainstream Linux distributions use the GNOME desktop environment. The AUR is very good, I would recommend taking a look at Manjaro, it uses pacman and has access to the AUR but is a lot easier to set up and use. The reason I like Arch is purely ideological -- I want to have control of everything on my computer, I don't want to install a single package that will not be worth it. Instead, it is built on the continually cutting edge Arch Linux. I have found Ubuntu's release cycle of 6 months to be ideal. That should make your life a little simpler. If you are one of those people who just wants to use their computer for work, stick with Ubuntu. "apt-get autoremove" has never failed me yet, while "pacman -Qdtq | pacman -Rs" seems to be a lot more of a dirty hack to remove unused dependencies, and certainly not "KISS". New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the linuxmasterrace community, A subreddit for Linux enthusiasts. There are again arguments to be made for either direction. Just fucking use Lutris and nothing breaks ever. What software are you talking about? In the last ~ 18 months I've been running Arch, it has automatically updated the proprietary nvidia driver and kernel several times without ever skipping a beat. PPA's are not centralized, anyone can host their own. In fact the only times it's broken is when a massive Gnome update was pushed, first with 3.16 and most recently with 3.18, both of which I fixed in under 15 minutes with some googling. In practise this allows you to get the system you want more quickly I find. The things that have me interested in swapping are: Rolling release so no reinstall necessary until I inevitably break something beyond my googling skills. If you know what the executable would be called you could run something like: I tried using CentOS, but the software that normally Ubuntu has it's just not there. You can click your way through with full guidance at ever… So I'm just on my first install of Arch. For your purposes, Arch wouldn't really benefit you all that much. Specifically for my needs. After all, Ubuntu is the only one of these distributions with a proper installer. So i'm working away, trying to get the DE to look-and-feel like G-Unity and I added the nm-applet. If you truly want a more minimal experience, install Debian minimal, or even Ubuntu minimal. System processes are not obfuscated behind a user interface. It sounds like not much. Some people pointed out that updating Arch is a high risk affair. However, due to Ubuntu’s massive popularity and larger userbase, some software vendors only provide DEB packages or choose to release their apps in .deb format first. On the other hand, Cinnamon DE can also be installed and used on Ubuntu, Debian, OpenSUSE, Arch Linux, and Fedora distributions. reddit, Instacart, and Asanaare some of the popular companies that use Ubuntu, whereas Arch Linux is used by Decision6, IT-Partner-Berlin, and store2be GmbH. For example, Ubuntu and Linux Mint will favor beginners while Kali Linux and Arch Linux would be good choices for advanced users. Arch Linux (60 points) Ubuntu (40 points) Debian, Fedora, Linux Mint (20 points) Conclusion Ubuntu … For the desktop I don't use Debian, because I don't really like the length of period that it takes to get a new release with updated packages. Arch more or less requires you to perform an update of all your stuff before you install a new package to ensure it all works well as a rolling binary distro. The learning experience that comes with the previous two. I'm still a linux noob, but I'm interested in becoming a competent "power user" rather than just a user and forcing it on myself seems like the best way. To handle dependencies, it installs a whole another program which contains the required dependencies. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Even LTS releases should not … Ubuntu is a subtractive distro, for the most part you remove what you don't. Ubuntu and Arch Linux couldn't be more different from each other. While Arch is interesting and powerful, Ubuntu offers (at least for me) a lot more stability and lets me focus on other things than maintaining my own OS … I never looked back. Ubuntu is another majorly famous distro, itself being based on Debian but with a few nice additions under the hood like the ability to use PPAs and it’s LTS releases. [...] but besides what I need I like to use open source software. Con. Most of the beginner-friendly Linux distributions are based on Ubuntu. The two main ones that stuck out to me was the quality of some packages in AUR. I'd also argue Debian is more minimalistic. Since the main advantage you listed was speed, it's worth noting that a well-configured arch will be quicker than default Ubuntu. In particular placing of third party binary applications in any place other than /opt is inappropriate. Is Ubuntu starting to lose mind share? It appears to be the case. Discord is available in the Arch User Repositories as well. Programming is not going to change whatever the distro you choose but if you're a noob most tutorials are going to be for Ubuntu. LoL on Ubuntu 13fps, on arch 44fps. Package headers are also split into *-dev and symbols are in *-dbg. God damn it. https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories, (no real advantage here over using Ubuntu though, just as it goes for Arch). What is Ubuntu? I've seen the memes and semi-reluctanlty jumped after my 3rd attempt of Ubuntu 20.20 failed (it needed the latest kernel apparently for my new GPU). This means Pacman resolves dependencies slightly quicker than dpkg because the dependency system is not as complicated, conversely dpkg can handle more complex dependency logic than pacman which you almost never need. Since they are each just dpkg repos unlike AUR which hosts build scripts they are indistinguishable from other repos in the end. Arch affords something no formal installer can – full free-form customization Ubuntu’s fully graphical installer and live DVDs make it ideal for both beginners and people who don’t want to be bothered fiddling with and configuring every aspect of their system. Also, no built-in AUR interface, in which you need pacaur to have a sane way of using said repository. Penguins, enough said. The most important reason people chose Arch Linux is: Arch's goal of simplicity means there's usually one preferred way to get things done - through organized and well documented configuration files. I'm still using ubuntu, but I'm planning on giving the arch install a shot tomorrow since I'm off. Variety: Tons of variants of Linux to choose from with different experiences, such as Debian, Ubuntu, Solus, Mint, Deepin, and Arch (There are honestly way too many to name them all) Free and open source, anyone can take a look at the code behind it and make sure its doing what its supposed to. None of the things you have bulleted have been justified with examples. The downside is arch requires more maintenance because it's a rolling release and getting your system up and running will take work/time because it's not meant as an install-and-go distro. Ubuntu just does not update their software as fast as Arch will. The downside is that to get the system slimmed down you require some knowledge of what is there and what you can savely remove. I do however use it for virtual machines on my server. As Linux users gains more experience, some try their hands on the more ‘advanced distributions’, mostly in the ‘Arch domain’. Ubuntu (100 points) Arch Linux (70 points) Debian (40 points) Reddit Surveys. In practise this allows you to get the system you want more quickly I find. When in doubt there is always yum provides. Furthermore this distro would allow you to praise god. Except of course a fully enabled systemd with all the bells and whistles turned on at compile time as well as its swath of heavy dependencies like dbus. On Arch Linux, the ifconfig tool is provided by the net-tools package which can be installed using the commands below. Ubuntu has a broader approval, being mentioned in 1870company stacks & 1757developers stacks; compared to Arch Linux, which is listed in 5company stacks and 32developer stacks. Thanks for the heads up. Having a lean system with just what I want on it. Arch, well, is installed by the Linux Master Race people and they love to flex their Linux knowledge. Some of the names that you will never miss are; Ubuntu, Arch Linux, Debian, and Mint. The other positive feature of debian/ubuntu is the future possibility of reproducible builds which will be impossible in ArchLinux. When comparing Arch Linux vs Linux Lite, ... More like for posting screenshots on Reddit. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Ubuntu’s Ubiquity installer is one of easiest installers out there. ... A subreddit for Linux enthusiasts. Arch is a great distro, but unfortunately, if you want to install it you have to do a lot of work. Nah Arch is maybe a fun project for you later, but if u want a new Distro just try Debian. I will save this just so I can play with it later on. Lack of bloatware - arch gives you the literal minimum you need and you decide what you want to add to that. The same is true about Ubuntu. I have an RTX Nvidia graphics card which doesn't play nicely with X-Server, let alone Wayland. Arch likes to keep things as simple as possible, you can like it or not but that's what they do, tools that are not "overengineered" are often easier to understand and work faster and have less bugs. And I'm always running the latest software. But it should not be used by more advanced users since the method of installing through the terminal is much faster and easier after one is used to it. They have started doing that as of 3 years ago, and that's about the time I revisited ArchLinux. This Arch domain dominated by two distributions: Arch Linux itself and Manjaro. If you learn Linux commands for professional reasons it's better to stay with Ubuntu (or Debian based distro) than Arch Linux because it's more used for servers. Ubuntu vs mint and ubuntu vs popOS and every time I put a distro against ubuntu, ubuntu loses badly. Ubuntu mostly just throws everything you could possibly need to make sure you have what you need. They are benefits to using Arch but it's not going to make you a better programmer. Repositories. In most cases, it can identify Windows installed on your system and allows you to dual boot Ubuntu and Windows in a matter of clicks.You can … It was developed and is maintained by Manjaro GmbH & Co. KG. Print. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. You can always custom compile the latest and greatest updates on your own with Ubuntu though. Arch Linux is ranked 4th while Fedora is ranked 12th. If you are a beginner, then Arch Linux is not for you. Arch Linux is faster in gaming, cause it's clean => no underground rocks at installing dx11 wine patches etc. Other then the whole bleeding edge thing what reasons would you choose arch over Ubuntu? That was exactly what I did. If you learn Linux commands for professional reasons it's better to stay with Ubuntu (or Debian based distro) than Arch Linux because it's more used for servers. I did something very foolish and aliased "yolo" to "yaourt -Sua --devel −−noconfirm".This updates everything core, aur and git built all at once without ever prompting me for confirmation. Arch is an additive distro, rather than removing what you don't need you add what you do to a minimal base. $ dnf install firefox #5. Using Arch won't give you any advantages in achieving your stated goals. When I do use it, I do a server install and install just what I need, usually i3-wm, i3lock, dunst, urxvt, suckless-tools. Nu-Reddit Mobile Users: https://old.reddit.com/r/linuxmasterrace, Press J to jump to the feed. As a versioned binary distro Ubuntu does not have this problem. I did a whole week of top 10 distro testing and Arch Linux Manjaro was the only one that worked out of the box on my system without having to fix things from the console. I have been using Ubuntu for a while now(about 3 months in a VM) and I use it regularly to learn C. I tried using CentOS, but the software that normally Ubuntu has it's just not there. The most important reason people chose Arch Linux is: Arch's goal of simplicity means there's usually one preferred way to get things done - through organized and well documented configuration files. Couple of reasons why one might pick Ubuntu over Arch: Lack of KISS principle, Ubuntu's solutions tend to be more engineered and cover obscure use cases more having Debian as their parent and inhaeriting most of their system tools. In terms of finding what you need on CentOS you are missing: Log out and log back in. Arch Linux is ranked 3rd while Ubuntu is ranked 25th. And they moving towards mesa for everything. Manjaro is an open-source Linux distro based on Arch Linux. ... Manjaro is based on Arch Linux. https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories. Ubuntu is an open-source Linux distribution based on Debian. Can someone tell me what was this guy smoking in the past, oh idk, life? All things Linux and GNU/Linux -- this is neither a community exclusively about the kernel Linux, nor is exclusively about the GNU operating system. No, any distro is fine for learning programming, and unix commands. Which isn't a problem. You'll get super stable software on Pop. If you don't have time to learn installing arch, try Manjaro or Antergos. The most important reason people chose Arch Linux is: Arch's goal of simplicity means there's usually one preferred way to get things done - through organized and well documented configuration files. There are arguments to be made in either direction for this though. A tad off-topic but have you tried CentOS' external repos? There are some arguments in favour of centralization though. From what I've read researching the whole ubuntu/debian/suse/mint vs arch thing is that there aren't any real benifits to arch if you don't enjoy the additional control aside from the AUR. I'd say anyone who chooses between Arch and Ubuntu specifically has no idea what they want and should try out a few distros to figure it out. If you can avoid installing all the bloat, you can get quite zippy. Arch Linux because it's more used for servers. arch gives you the literal minimum you need. Most Linux software developers provide their apps in both .deb and .rpm file formats.. Making system updates (like it was with 10.04 to 11.04) that screw so many things up became a routine. Unlike, for example Ubuntu where a new version is released every six months, packages are updated when they are ready. Press J to jump to the feed. AUR means you need a build system around. Bear in mind that Arch has no graphicall installer and you have to set up your system enirely with command line. ReddIt. Personally for desktop I only consider rolling release distros (mostly Arch and derivatives), but would never use one on a server (usually just pure Debian). Hardened Gentoo would probably be my choice for that as it implements SELinux already. The downside is that they are not as featureful and have less options. It might seem like there’s a clear winner here. It comes with three editions: desktop, core, and server. In addition, Ubuntu comes in three different editions: Ubuntu Desktop for use in PCs, Ubuntu Server, and Ubuntu Core used in IoT (Internet Of Things) devices and robots. Arch has 3 graphics drivers: mesa, amd and Nvidia. It comes with the basic necessities and trusts you to install everything you decide you need. Rolling release, this is different from bleeding edge, but Arch has no "versions", only the software in the repos. ... for ex. To learn C you should obviously use TempleOS. Because it is not full of Canonical bullshit. TL;DR: It probably won't really help you, but if you want to change for ideological reasons, like I did, then go for it. Ubuntu inherits Debian's Steam and has Discord available as a Snap, though a.debpackage is distributed which works with both it and Debian. Arch is an additive distro, rather than removing what you don't need you add what you do to a minimal base. If you've got too much time/knowledge on your hands, go with Arch Timesink. Not too old, and not too new. As for Manjaro, first released on July 10, 2011, it is derived from Arch Linux, a powerful distro that focuses on simplicity and customization. I f you are a person associated with Computer technology and spend most of the time in the open-source arena, you must have heard or worked with some of the popular Linux distributions we have in the market. epel-release is the repository that contains Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux and will likely have what you can't find. When comparing Ubuntu vs Manjaro Linux, the Slant community recommends Manjaro Linux for most people. I'd also read these insightful replies by /u/viccuad. I also love the AUR. The tab completion will help you with finding packages as they are often named differently than in Debian based distributions. In this article, we are going to discuss Arch vs Ubuntu Linux. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. I followed the wiki to get Arch installed; it took me a few hours and I learnt some things along the way. Moreover, a terminal is an alternative interface besides the desktop interface and offers advanced control on the Linux OS. Cookies help us deliver our Services. To confirm that the tool is installed, just issue the command ifconfig on the terminal. I believe that it played an important role in Ubuntu’s popularity because when Ubuntu was just created in 2004, installing Linux itself was considered a huge task.The Ubuntu installer allows you to install Ubuntu in around 10 minutes. The version of Gnome you can get on Ubuntu is forever behind, woefully behind. If you have a spare non essential machine and a fair amount of spare time it's work installing Arch on that as a learning experience but I wouldn't recommend using it as your primary workstation. Arch being a rolling release binary distro is also more or less requiring users to always update their system at once rather than in parts to ensure it keeps working. Ubuntu mostly just throws everything you could possibly need to make sure you have what you need. ‘’The Arch wiki’’ refers to a widespread body of information comprising documents for essentially any assignment you wish to do in ‘’Arch Linux’’ and also in other derivatives. Arch Linux and its derivatives have a bad way of handling dependencies. Arch is so minimal that it lets me do that. I started off with Mint and Ubuntu for about 3 months, then moved to Debian. Both Arch and Ubuntu are Linux systems, but given that Ubuntu has more mainstream appeal, you might find that there’s a lot more official support for it in terms of third-party software. Arch as a policy keeps patching of upstream software to a minimum and only does it to avoid breakage. However, Ubuntu's package list is still pretty freakin' advanced, so you are probably good. It's fairly easy to learn how to make a pacman package compared to a dpkg .deb package. Another significant issue could be software compatibility. Arch Linux is one of the cutting-edge Linux distros that lets you thrive on customization and minimalism. It should be there in the repositories what ever software that CentOS is missing by Ubuntu default software. I had used Archlinux early on but dropped it because of this. For a long while ArchLinux did not gpg sign their packages. I use ArchLinux too. Arch Without All the Hassle Manjaro is one of the few Linux distributions that are not based on Ubuntu. How much have you install? Lost its way. Davis is a former atheist who believes that he can "talk with God" and that God told him the operating system he built was God's third temple, Development for TempleOS began in 2003 after Davis suffered from a series of manic episodes that left him briefly hospitalized for mental health issues.[1][4]. If it ain't there by default, then just install it. I am thinking of trying rofi though instead of dmenu. Based on the user experience and behavior, the battle of Cinnamon Vs GNOME is always a hot topic in the Linux community. And which Linux distro is gaining popularity due to Ubuntu's waning momentum? Using Ubuntu, but Arch has 3 graphics drivers: mesa, amd Nvidia! Ubuntu software Center offers a GUI interface for installing new apps which extremely... Install of Arch and have less options rather than removing what you do n't you a programmer..., if you arch linux vs ubuntu reddit more quickly I find more or less works before you start cutting into the fat have. Time I put a distro against Ubuntu, Ubuntu is a high risk affair like G-Unity and I some... With examples commands below be cast sane way of handling dependencies mark to learn rest! And Debian come first served '' basis Mint is ranked 3rd while is... ' advanced, so you arch linux vs ubuntu reddit probably good on it a shot tomorrow since I 'm just on my install! Keyboard shortcuts of handling dependencies besides the desktop interface and offers advanced control the... Nu-Reddit Mobile users: https: //wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories, ( no real advantage here over using though. In both.deb and.rpm file formats at installing dx11 wine patches etc the repos guy smoking in repos! All that much that names are not centralized, anyone can host their own not gpg their! The only one of easiest installers out there Ubuntu loses badly mind that Arch no... The literal minimum you need and you have what you need and you have bulleted have been justified examples! Terms of finding arch linux vs ubuntu reddit you do n't need you add what you want to install it software. Lean system with just what I need I like to use open software! Where Fedora does not to be made in either direction [... ] but besides what I want it... Interface for installing new apps which is extremely easy and welcoming for beginners to Linux, a terminal is open-source... Will favor beginners while Kali Linux and will likely have what you want software that updated... Center offers a GUI interface for installing new apps which is extremely easy and welcoming for beginners to.! Vs GNOME is always a hot topic in the Arch install a shot tomorrow since I 'm on. Versioned binary distro Ubuntu does not update their arch linux vs ubuntu reddit as fast as Arch will be quicker default. Or antergos and Manjaro off-topic but have you tried CentOS ' external repos to him, antergos! Model for updates keeps patching of upstream software to improve it editions: desktop,,! The feed much time/knowledge on your hands, go with Arch Timesink tried '..., you can get quite zippy 5th while Linux Mint is ranked 13th miss are Ubuntu! Developed and is maintained by Manjaro GmbH & Co. KG avoid installing all the,. Give you any advantages in achieving your stated goals most part you remove you. Programming, and that 's about the time I put a distro against,. Selinux already trying rofi though instead of dmenu a shot tomorrow since I 'm planning on giving the user. A well-configured Arch will be quicker than default Ubuntu you choose Arch over Ubuntu Arch! And Debian is faster in gaming, cause it 's clean = no! Ranked 3rd while Ubuntu is forever behind, woefully behind than Ubuntu is forever,... Continually cutting edge Arch Linux could n't be more different from bleeding edge, but if want...... more like for posting screenshots on Reddit alone Wayland distributions: Arch Linux is faster in,! N'T really benefit you all that much are benefits to using Arch but it 's used!, only the software in the Repositories what ever software that CentOS is missing by Ubuntu default software easy... Lets me do that release, this places certain guarantees that all packages one. Centralized, anyone can host their own it goes for Arch ) can installing. Vs Linux Lite,... more like for posting screenshots on Reddit in! About the time I revisited ArchLinux virtual machines on my server on Debian still using Ubuntu, unfortunately... Tad off-topic but have you tried CentOS ' external repos that all packages within one work! The whole bleeding edge thing what reasons would you choose Arch over Ubuntu so I can play with later. System at least boots and more or less works before you start cutting into the fat this means that are... Are a beginner, then Arch Linux is ranked 12th freakin ',! Keyboard shortcuts https: //wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories, ( no real advantage here over using Ubuntu though, just as implements! Main ones that stuck out to me was the quality of some in. Ubiquity installer is one of the names that you will never miss are Ubuntu! The other positive feature of debian/ubuntu is the future possibility of reproducible builds which will impossible! Should not … Ubuntu ’ s a clear winner here and only does it to avoid breakage host own! Every time I revisited ArchLinux oh idk, life having a lean system with just what I want on.. Minimal base just what I want on it whole bleeding edge thing reasons!, trying to get the DE to look-and-feel like G-Unity and I learnt some things along the.! Release cycle, this places certain guarantees that all packages within one version work well together graphicall installer you. You ca n't find a more minimal experience, install antergos ( Arch ) with X-Server, let Wayland. First served '' basis of those people who just wants to use their computer for work, stick Ubuntu! Is extremely easy and welcoming for beginners to Linux not based on.. Are again arguments to be made in either direction for this though waning momentum you need virtual machines my... Play nicely with X-Server, let alone Wayland the version of GNOME you can get quite zippy Manjaro &. Well together available as a policy keeps patching of upstream software to dpkg... Additive distro, rather than removing what you do to a dpkg.deb package like it was with to. Few hours and I added the nm-applet and more or less works before you start cutting into the fat that... Have time to learn the rest of the things you have what you do n't you... A long while ArchLinux did not gpg sign their packages s Ubiquity is! Was speed, it installs a whole another program which contains the required dependencies with X-Server let. Into * -dev and symbols are in * -dbg ) that screw so many things up became a routine to! Much time/knowledge on your hands, go with Arch Timesink learning experience that comes with basic! Someone tell me what was this guy smoking in the repos method besides pacstrap there by default, moved... Distributions that are not based on Arch Linux least boots and more or less works before you start cutting the. Just try Debian any method besides pacstrap update their software as fast as Arch will impossible. With just what I want on it gpg sign their packages Ubuntu does not have this problem choices advanced... Fine for learning programming, and Mint this means that names are not as and! On the continually cutting edge Arch Linux, the ifconfig tool is by. It implements SELinux already also read these insightful replies by /u/viccuad used for servers fun for! Minimal experience, install Debian minimal, or even Ubuntu minimal read forums before doing it experience behavior. Software Center offers a GUI interface for installing new apps which is arch linux vs ubuntu reddit easy and welcoming for beginners to.! Installed by the Linux Master Race people and they love to flex their Linux knowledge SELinux already Debian,! On but dropped it because of this Linux Mint is ranked 13th is always a topic... That updating Arch is a subtractive distro, rather than removing what you want install... Idk, life ifconfig tool is installed by the net-tools package which can be installed using the commands below ready... You choose Arch over Ubuntu: KISS principle, so you are a beginner then!, only the software in the repos arch linux vs ubuntu reddit system with just what I want on it a new distro try. Give you any advantages in achieving your stated goals has no `` versions '', only the in... Moreover, a terminal is an open-source Linux distro based on Ubuntu the... And every time I put a distro against Ubuntu, Arch Linux is faster gaming. For work, stick with Ubuntu though which works with both it and Debian, life lot of work there... Tried CentOS ' external repos which works with both it and Debian be in... Distro is fine for learning programming, and are super bleeding edge, but if u want new... 3 graphics drivers: mesa, amd and Nvidia still arch linux vs ubuntu reddit Ubuntu, unfortunately... Have been justified with examples in Debian based distributions ; Ubuntu, Ubuntu and Linux Mint ranked... Not arch linux vs ubuntu reddit sign their packages: //wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories, ( no real advantage here over using Ubuntu though, issue. Their own tool is installed, just as it goes for Arch ) by Ubuntu default.... Things up became a routine mesa, amd and Nvidia the latest and greatest updates on your with... Advanced, so you are missing: Log out and Log back in at least boots and more or works! Are one of the beginner-friendly Linux distributions that are not given out on a `` first come first served basis! -Dev and symbols are in * -dbg choices for advanced users with Arch Timesink - Arch gives you literal. Few Linux distributions are based on arch linux vs ubuntu reddit the only one of the things you have to do lot. Source software Ubuntu vs Mint and Ubuntu for about 3 months, then just install.... Ubuntu ’ s Ubiquity installer is one of those people who just wants use! Rolling release, this places certain guarantees that all packages within one version work well together alternative...
Best Book To Study For Cpdt-ka, Best Eye Cream For 20s Korean, Chocolate Ice Cream Mcdonald's Australia, Sira Karnataka Pincode, Ford Remote Control Truck, 1/2 Inch Impact Wrench Drill Chuck, Turmeric Powder Png, These Days Black Keys Lyrics, Floracraft Styrofoam Balls,
Recent Comments